Ma ma ma My Redemption

Got my redemption from Upper Deck. In September, in a box of 2007 SP Authentic I pulled a dual auto Chirography of Hanley Ramirez and Stephen Drew. I was pretty excited. I redeemed it immediately. Today, just 12-16 short weeks (or 25) later my card arrived in the mail. Here it is.



I don't know what this card is but it sure isn't Hanley ramirez. Miguel Cabrera and Dontrelle Willis dual auto. I guess it's pretty comparable. Ya know, Miguel Cabrera or Jose Feliciano, ya got no complaints.

I would have liked to see that Hanley Ramirez though. I don't hold this against Upper Deck. I know nobody likes redemptions, but what the hell are they supposed to do if the player doesn't sign?

What I'm most disappointed about this card is the Willis auto. I like Dontrelle. Everything I've heard about him is that he's a good guy. He sure was exciting a few years ago. But c'mon, what the hell is up with that sig? Oh well, I still hope he can put it back together this year.

Upper Deck was also kind enough to send a bonus pack due to my long wait.




Here it is. A pack of 2007 Masterpieces with 4 WHOLE CARDS! Can you believe it? That's like a card for every month it was late! Thanks Upper Deck. You really shouldn't have. I feel like I should send you a check for $1.34. I'm getting away with robbery here.

I especially like how it's clearly marked "BONUS" so that when I'm enjoying opening my pack I don't forget for a second that they did it out of the goodness of their heart.

Might as well open the pack and see what's there.




Look at Josh Hamilton with those tattoos. You know he used to do drugs. Turned his life around. Now he regrets EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. Don't believe me? Just ask Joe Buck.

All in all, not a bad surprise to find in the mail after work today. The dual auto is a nice card even if it isn't the one that I expected. And, I like Masterpieces so that was nice too.

Maybe the best part was the nice note they sent me that included the following: "We hope you enjoyed this exchanged item and hope it finds a cherished place in your collection". As cherished place in my collection? Who says that? I thought it was pretty funny.

Now I'll see if there's any way I can turn my nice new Cabrera/Willis auto into a Sizemore auto. That would be the bees knees. I would cherish it.

2009 Topps vs. Upper Deck

My daily trip to Target finally yielded some results. The results were only a gravity box thingy of $2 Topps backs but at least I could finally get some cards. I had already opened a few blasters of Upper Deck a few days ago. Now I have a way to compare the two sets.

A lot of people have busted some of the new products and given their opinions. My objective here is to finally get an answer. I’ve selected a few players in order to compare their Topps and Upper Deck cards side by side. Let’s see how they match up.

If you’ve already reviewed one of more of these products, this gives you a chance to find out if you were right. It is easy to determine if you are correct. If your opinion matches mine, then congratulations, you are correct. If you came to a conclusion different then mine, better luck next year.

Let’s see how it all shakes out.



1. Matt Antonelli – T#159 UD#402

This is allegedly a rookie card for both sets. I’m not sure that means anything anymore so we’ll ignore it. I’m not going to talk much of the overall front design. Either you are like borders or you don’t. I think they both have a good design. Both photos of Matt are decent.

The anecdotes on the back couldn’t be farther apart. UD commemorates Matt’s first HR in a sept win against the Rockies. Topps commemorates Matt getting a hit in his first major league at bat against Greg Maddux and mixes in an appropriate quote. The Topps anecdote wins in a landslide.

WINNER: Topps



2. Lastings Milledge – T#152 UD#393

They both get to write the name Lastings (is that plural?) Milledge so even with that awesome name we have to call it a draw. The photo on the front is a huge win for Upper Deck. Topps probably thought they had a really nice shot of Lastings making a diving attempt. They’re right too. It just can’t come close to that great, colorful picture in front of the wall. This may end up as my favorite card in the set.

It doesn’t even matter what the back says.

WINNER: Upper Deck



3. Vladimir Guerrero – T#130 UD#178

Slight edge to Topps on the front photo. Nothing wrong with the Upper Deck photo, he just looks goofier with that big grin on Topps. I’m thinking of one of the Blog People who will probably appreciate this card.

The UD anecdote is boring and about a 2007 stat. Hey UD, it’s 2009. This is a wash with the Topps anecdote which isn’t there because there isn’t room.

WINNER: Topps by a grin



4. Jason Giambi – T#26 UD#263

Topps wins the battle of the photos with that mustache. Seriously, I just keep hearing about how great the UD photography is, yet they make a card of Giambi without the mustache. C’mon UD, the mustache is the only reason TOO make a card of this guy.
UD wins the back with a boring anecdote about Giambi hitting the 30 HR mark for the 8th time. Topps, once again, has no anecdote. So I have to give it to UD by a little. However, it’s not even close to being enough to make up for the mustache. Not by a long shot.

WINNER: Topps



5. Mark Reynolds – T#324 UD#7

Mini-battle of the horizontal cards. UD wins the front battle. I don’t know why. I just like that picture better on the UD card. Maybe it’s the background, which is pretty cool, although it probably is a spring training photo, being all yellow and whatnot.

*Who else is having trouble getting over the fact that this guy’s only been around for 2 years? Doesn’t it seem like we’ve been hearing about him for 7 years? I swear this guy killed my fantasy team in 2002.

The back anecdotes are equally boring. Let’s give the edge to Topps for having SLG and OPS in the stats. Hey UD, once again, it’s 2009. Let’s get with the program. You’re killing the Royals who (I heard) use your cards as their scouting reports.

Still, I like that fence.

WINNER: Upper Deck




6. Hideki Okajima – T#112 UD#54

UD wins the front with that stupid look on his face. The Topps picture is kind of boring.

Topps wins the back with a much more interesting anecdote. Okajima is #8 on the Red Sox list with the lowest ERA for a pitcher with 130 innings. The list includes Papelbon, Ruth, Cy Young, and dudes named Rube Foster and Dutch Leonard. Not a bad little tidbit. UD on the other had throws out a stupid little stat from 2007 that would have taken all of 8 seconds to look up in baseball reference.

This one’s close. I like Hideki’s stupid look, but UD gave absolutely no effort on the back. Hmmmmmm…….I like the number 112 better than 54.

WINNER: Topps

(Hey make your own damn list if you don’t like it)




7. Topps Attax vs. UpperDeckU.com

Actually, the Topps thing might be fun for kids. Actually, the UD thing might be too. How the hell should I know?

Ultimately, I put both of these out in the back yard. The dog crapped closer to the Topps card.

WINNER: Upper Deck



8. Topps League Leaders #221 vs. Upper Deck Team Leaders #440

On the one hand, the UD card features all Indians. On the other hand, I’m doing this for the benefit of ALL collectors, whether white, black, male, female, young, and old or Yankee fan. Hell, even Thorzul is entitled to an unbiased competition. So, I guess I like the action shots on the Topps card slightly better.

UD wins the back with nice little blurbs on all of the players.

There is one other problem with the Topps card. Either Topps screwed up, or the leagues re-aligned without telling anyone and Cliff Lee led the NATION LEAGUE in Era last year.

WINNER: Upper Deck




9. Topps Turkey Red Cole Hamels #TR41 vs. UD Starquest Dice-K #SQ7

I really love Turkey Red. I couldn’t be happier that it’s back this year. The Starquest isn’t bad either, but if it went away for a year I wouldn’t miss it like I did Turkey Red last year. Turkey Red is better. Hands down.

WINNER: Topps



10. Topps Legends of the Game Lou Gehrig vs. Yankee Stadium Idiocy Joba Chamberlain

This isn’t even really fair. To put a cool looking Lou Gehrig card against one of the most annoying things ever forced upon the card collecting world. Then again, I didn’t make Upper Deck do it. I about shit when I opened up my first pack of UD and found another one of these stupid things. Is this ever going to end?

Let’s just concentrate on the Gehrig and pretend the other one isn’t there. My only regret is that I can only count this as one win for Topps (or can I?).

WINNER: Topps




11. Topps Gold Ichiro #300 vs. USA Wes Hatton #18U-WH

I’ve got nothing against a gold parallel set. No problem. It’s a nice Ichiro card. If you got all of the gold parallels you’d have a great little set there. But, who doesn’t love the USA baseball set? I mean, Wes Hatton pitched 5 innings, had 8 K’s, and even went 2-5 at the plate. That doesn’t make him better than Ichiro, it just makes this a better, more interesting card.

WINNER: Upper Deck

ULTIMATE WINNER: TOPPS 6-5 or 6-3 if you subtract 2 from Upper Deck for the YSL bullshit. Either way, Topps wins.

So, who here got it right? Did you all know that the Topps set was better? Or, did some of you mistakenly believe that the Upper Deck Set was better?

Don’t be so hard on yourself if you were wrong. It doesn’t make you stupid. Really. At least not stupid in a Carl Everett sort of way. Just not quite as smart as the rest of us. And, there’s always next year.